Presented by Anne Lidor, MD at the SAGES 2014 Meeting; Symposium: Ethics of Innovation
IDEAL collaboration–55 sec https://www.ideal-collaboration.net/
IDEAL framework–1:39 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=24113195
citations–3:10 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=23549
Keyword(s): accreditation, ACS NSQIPII risk calculator, activity report, adverse events, Asia, bariatric surgery, CABG, Candada, cardiac surgery, clinical registry, CMS, Cochrane collaboration, congenital heart surgery, consensus document, ECR, endpoints, esophageal cx, ethical issues, ethics, EURO-NOTES, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, European Society for GI Endoscopy, European study, general thoracic surgery, gold standard, government regulated, healthcare measurement, IDEAL collaboration, IDEAL framework, industry, innovation, International Journal of Surgery, IPOEMS, IRB, Japan, lobectomy, lung cx, mandatory reporting, methodology, monitoring, mortality calculators, new techniques, new technologies, nonpartisan, nonprofit, NOSCAR, NQF, NSQIP, outcomes, performance based payment, performance measures, Physician Quality Reporting System, POEM, pre-clinical training, process measures, proctoring, professional innovation database, professional societies, prospective data, prospective development studies, pt positioning, pt safety, public reporting, public service organization, QI, RCT, registry, reimbursement, reporting, reporting standards, researchers, retrospective data, risk-adjusted LOS, robotic surgery, safety issues, society members, structural measures, STS National Database, Surgical Endoscopy, surgical research, tracking outcomes, training, U.S., voluntary participation